Proven Efficacy
"Silicone gel dispensed from a tube has significant benefits in ease of use, but different formulations of silicone gel may vary in efficacy." [1]
Studies on the Efficacy of Dermatix® in Scar Management |
||||
Study |
Patients |
Intervention |
Scar Evaluation |
Outcome |
Controlled Comparative Study |
||||
Chan et al. [2]; prospective, randomized, double-masked, within-subkect comparison study |
50 Asian patients who underwent median sternotomy |
Twice-daily silicone gel on half of wound compared with placebo gel on other half of wound from postoperative week 2 to month 3 |
Vancouver Scar Scale scores of pigmentaion, vascularity, pliability, height, pain, and itchiness |
Scars that developed during silicone gel treatment were significantly flatter, less red, and more pliable and associated with significantly less pain and itching than scars that developed during placebo treatment |
Signorini and Clementoni [3]; prospoective, randomized, parallel-group comparison study |
160 patients who underwent surgery |
Twice-daily silicone gel treatment compared with no treatment initiated from 10 days to 3 weeks after surgery for 4 months |
Scar quality (normal mature, slightly hypertrophic, hypertrophic, or keloid scar based on color, hardness, elevation, and relationship to wound margins) |
Scar quality was significantly better in the silicone gel group than in the no treatment group at the 6-month follow-up visit: the incidence of hypertrophic of keloid scarring was 7% in the silicone gel group compared with 26% in the no treatment group |
Chernoff et al. [4]; prospoective, within-subject comparison study |
30 patients with bilateral hypertrophic scars, keloids, or scars will in an erythematous and raised stage of healing |
Silicone gel, SGS, or a combination of treatments for one scar compared with no treatment for the bilateral scar for 3 months |
Scar elevation and skin surface texture measued using optical profilometryl erythema; pliability; severity of symptoms |
Scars treated with silicone gel, SGS, or silicone gel/SGS were statistically significantly less elevated, less red, and associated with fewer sympromes than untreated scars |
Fonseca Capdevilla et al. [5]; prospective, parallel-group comparison study |
132 patiens who underwent removal of a benign skin lesion |
Silicone gel treatment compared with SGS treatments initiated within 1 monnth of surgey |
Height; redness; pliability; itching; pain/tenderness |
Silicone gel and SGS were both effective in improving scar redness, hardness, elevation, pain, and itching; there were no statistically significant differences between silicone and SGS on any efficay parameter at the month 6 follow-up |
Large-scale Observational Study |
||||
Sepehrmanesh [6]; prospective, open-label, non-controlled study |
1,522 patients with scars |
Silicone gel was aplpied on average twice daily for 2 to 6 months, maximum 10 months |
Height; color; pliability; itching; pain/tenderness |
Improvement in scar color, pliability, height, itching, and pain/tenderness after silicone gel treatment of approximately 70% to 84.2% of patients |
Small Case Series |
||||
Murison and James [7]; prospective, noncontrolled study |
6 patients with excessive scars (most at least 2 years old) |
Silicone gel used for 8 weeks |
Adapted Vancouver Scar Scale scores of elevation, redness, hardness, itching, tenderness and painl collagen content and blood flow measured using intracutaneous spectrophotometry |
All scars showed improvement in redness, elevation, hardness, and itching, and pain was reduced in symptomatic scars |









